1552—1610
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
Names Across Cultures / Collection 01
An index of names and lives at the crossroads of China and the world. Every name form is separated from its origin story; every public dossier shows what the sources establish and what remains unknown.
A 12-stop reading trail
This cohort follows the source dossier exactly. It is a history-of-method route, not a ranking.
Missionary and institutional formation
Missionary and institutional formation
Missionary and institutional formation
Missionary and institutional formation
Classical sinology
Classical sinology
Classical sinology
Classical sinology
Postwar China studies
Postwar China studies
Postwar China studies
Global and material turns
Five transformations
Missionaries increasingly worked from Chinese texts and scholarly networks rather than distant report.
Chairs, libraries, journals, and language training made sinology a professional field.
Dunhuang, oracle bones, archaeology, and historical phonology changed the evidence base.
Modern history and social science joined the older philological tradition.
Global, gender, material, environmental, and imperial approaches broadened the field.
Search the index
Rich dossiers open as pages. Seed records stay in this index until identity, usage, and sources meet the publication threshold.
38 records shown · 74 seed records available
1552—1610
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1614—1661
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1623—1693
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1777—1853
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1788—1832
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1797—1873
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1815—1897
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1818—1895
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1845—1935
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1865—1918
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1866—1934
This is a native Japanese name written in kanji, not an adopted Chinese name; source-level usage remains unreviewed.
1873—1930
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1878—1945
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1883—1945
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1884—1940
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1889—1978
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1889—1966
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1894—1979
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1900—1995
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1901—1995
This is a native Japanese name written in kanji, not an adopted Chinese name; source-level usage remains unreviewed.
1907—1991
Bestowed by Liang Sicheng; documented in biographical accounts of the Fairbanks in China.
1919—2017
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1919—1991
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1921—2018
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1922—2025
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1923—2009
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1925—2006
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1934—2021
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1936—2021
Bestowed by Fang Chao-ying; the account is preserved in a published interview.
1938—2023
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
United States
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
United States
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
Canada
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
United States
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
Germany / United States
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
Belgium / United Kingdom
The Chinese-language form is recorded in the editorial dossier; source-level usage and origin remain unreviewed.
1946—2026
Self-chosen; directly explained by Owen in a recorded interview.
Literature, philosophy, religion, and material culture
Ames explained the name and its Analects allusion in an interview.
Traditions in comparison
These are reading orientations, not fixed traits. Scholars moved between languages, universities, archives, and political contexts.
10 indexed records
Philology, catalogues, Buddhism, Dunhuang, and multilingual sources.
35 indexed records
Classics, literary translation, dynastic history, and area studies.
2 indexed records
Grammar, historical linguistics, philosophy, and comparative method.
1 indexed records
Borderlands, Mongolia, Tibet, Central Asia, and diplomatic knowledge.
12 indexed records
Deep premodern foundations, periodization, institutions, economy, and literature.
18 indexed records
Scholars and methods that cross national schools and institutional borders.
This week in the atlas
The weekly feature rotates through published dossiers without manufacturing new facts or thin pages.
Read the dossierOrigin documented
Ames explained the name and its Analects allusion in an interview.
Open dossierClaims point to visible sources; group citations are not disguised as proof of name provenance.
How names travelA print-friendly classroom sequence with prompts, vocabulary, and a source exercise.
Open classroom packA compact guide to sinology, Chinese Studies, and the five major methodological turns.
Open field guideCorrections are welcome when they include a specific record, claim, and traceable source.
Suggest a correctionDataset decision: the structured corpus remains an editorial asset, not a public dataset, while 74 seed records still lack person-level source depth. The searchable interface is public; bulk export is intentionally withheld.